Mar 11, 2008

Hillary, Etc.

I just subjected friends and family to this in e-mail form, and then realized it was most of a blog posting all its own.

********

It comes down to this for me: I would love to see a woman president. Just not THIS woman. While I think she could handle the job, I think the other side of the aisle is going to take one look at her and tell her to f- off. She's far too divisive a figure to be an effective president. Plus, all the things she skated on last time because she was "only First Lady"—Whitewater, the cattle futures, indicted Chinese fundraisers—would now be fair game.

And again, I already lived through 8 years of their marital psychodrama. It may not be fair, but it is a factor.

Obama has weaknesses, and they are the same reasons I thought he shouldn't run this time: Not enough experience, and a Chicago politics resume.

The VP thing is hilarious, and clearly a salvage effort. She's not truly trying to make him VP. Instead, I think she's trying to position herself for the spot should it come down to a brokered convention. She's just so damn transparent. When she was asked about it yesterday, she claimed the Obama-as-VP meme has "really been given a life of its own." Because now that she's been called on her inconsistency by Obama, she has to pretend that she and Bill didn't spend the past week trying to pump air into the idea.

In the words of Dorothy Parker, "They make me sick, they make me tired."

*********

And not 10 minutes after I sent the e-mail, I see Gov. Ed Rendell (PA--big friend of the Clintons) is talking about how he would be OK with Obama as Prez and Hill as VP. Because at this point, they'll go with whatever it takes to get her on the ticket.

If Obama's as smart as I think he is, he won't do it.

Jan 08, 2008

"If I didn't know he was a commie pig…"

As I’ve mentioned before, I make regular stops at freerepublic.com, just to get a view that is very different from mine and my friends’.  I wouldn't say I enjoy it—especially when someone cites Hillary's sniffle yesterday as "proof that we should repeal the 19th amendment"—but it is informative, in its way.

And before you start—I know.  I know the Freepers tend toward the very very Right Wing and are not at all representative of any views but their own.  They are certainly not to be taken as the standard Republican viewpoint (assuming there is one). Got it.

That said…  It’s been an interesting week over there. 

Iowa made the Freepers sit up and take notice of Obama—much more than they had before.  They’ve had Hillary in their sights for eight years now, and all of a sudden, she may not be the target to aim at.  So they’re split: Happy as hell to see Hillary losing, but a little disappointed that she may not make the convention, a little freaked by Republicans who seem to actually like Obama, and downright unnerved by the upstart himself.  Seriously—he gives some of them the creeps.

A random-ish sampling...  (And just for the record: I left out the comment where someone asked if Barack might be the Antichrist.  I figure we're going to get plenty of that in coming months.)

***

"Obama was impressive 4 years ago at their convention. I watched his speech at that time and was quite unnerved by him. He is a smooth, fast-talker. Indeed I had other thoughts about him as well that register a need for tin-foil. Let’s just say he frightens me as much as Imanutjob from Iran. We’re able to dissect Imanutjob’s rhetoric and define his threat, but Obama is much more smooth and deadly as one can tell from the sheeple gathering around him. It is not the fear of losing the Whitehouse etc. My fear of him is much more carnal."

***

"He freaks me out too. We can beat Hillary!. Half the nation hates her guts. But this guy makes the sheeple feel good about themselves. They don’t care what he advocates. They dont even know. They just know he would be the first-sorry-second Black President. And the MSM fall all over him because they want to say look we’re not racist, lets all hug and sing kumbaya. Never mind he’s a complete lightweight and the only sure thing about him is that your taxes will go up. If he gets the nomination, and if Hillary! doesn’t have him Vince Fostered before the election, I get a bad vibe about november. If we criticize anything the man says we will be pounced on by the liberal media.
Even I am squeamish criticizing him to friends.
He has friendly black man teflon."

***

"I felt very comfortable when I figured the rats [Democrats] were destined to nominate the repugnant, thoroughly unelectable Hillary. Her nomination would lead not only to a colossal electoral landslide for the Republican candidate (any Republican candidate) but would even improve the GOP’s chance to take back the House with the “down ticket” ripple effect. But Obama? The Obama phenomenon is too new to get a handle on, especially since right now it’s only the rats who are paying him much attention. I do sense the possibility, though, that with ten months of vigorous face time on TV the silly Obama fad might fade away like the hoola hoop, Trivial Pursuit, and Tickle My Elmo. I just hope it happens before election day 2008"

***

"He beat Hillary in the Iowa primary. And he’s still alive four days later. THAT is an accomplishment. Just wait until Wednesday. I really don’t see what these RAT voters see in him, but when you have the choices they have, Opie Taylor might be the one. (Hubby thinks Obama looks like Opie.) A friend of ours GUSHES, and I do mean GUSHES over Obama. It’s scary."

***

"I agree with an above poster about it being (way) too early to predict anything, but I was talking with my coworkers (all conservative) about Hussein the other day and we all came to practically the same conclusion. He'll be hard to beat because he is likable. If I didn't know he was a commie pig I'd be tempted to vote for him too just based on his ability to speak and present ideas. If Obahma wins it will be an electorial landslide and we will lose Congressional seats. This guy is the anti-Reagan and incredibly dangerous. Never thought I would say it but we would be better off if the Dems ran Hillary.

***

"His wife scares me more. She’s the cheerleader type. “You can do it, baby!” Probably not the exact quote, but I heard her say words to that effect several months ago on TV. Which made me think that Obama is being totally micro-managed, and pushed, and encouraged by her. If we end up with him, it’ll be another two-fer."

***

"You are right. The man is a Marxist like so many of the minority members in the House. They worship at the alter of Castro and Chavez and he would weaken this country so bad it would not be recognized. Hillary is less scary to me then this closet commie."

***

"'when Obama speaks and I see the faces of the people, it looks like the 1936 rallys in Germany '

Me too! Yesterday Jessica Yellin, on CNN, was mentioning how spellbound his audiences seemed, how they had lined up hours in advance to see him and how some had tears in their eyes while listening to him speak! They interviewed some of the audience members as they left an event. From what I could guess, the ages of these people ranged from the early twenties to around sixty. They were almost giddy in their praise of Obama, and keep in mind the man says virtually nothing of substance in these speeches. I can tell you that I found the whole report VERY unsettling."

May 03, 2007

Commander-Guy-in-Chief

Your president at work.  From a press conference transcript in the National Review's Media Blog:

"By the way, in the report [from James Baker and Lee Hamilton] it said, it is — the government may have to put in more troops to be able to get to that position. And that's what we do. We put in more troops to get to a position where we can be in some other place. The question is, who ought to make that decision? The Congress or the commanders? And as you know, my position is clear — I'm the commander guy."

Nov 08, 2006

It's Still Our Country

Dear Republicans & Republican voters,

Ouch. That looks like it hurts.

Signed,

The Rest of Us

************

Dear Democrats/Democrat-leaning People/Liberal Voters,

Not a bad job yesterday. Not overwhelming, but good enough. Today, you can gloat.  I recommend this (short) or this (much longer, wackier).

Tomorrow, though, it will be time to get to work.

Judging by my survey of (admittedly goofball-attracting) right-wing blogs and Web sites, they're pretty mad. There's a lot of finger-pointing going on over there right now. However, it's going to settle down, probably after Bush gives his speech this afternoon. At that point, expect them to become entrenched, dedicated and active. When they get mad, they fight back—we have seen that time and again.

The choice is yours: You can lay down and let them label you as weak, terrorist-loving, America-hating, asylum-giving liberals. Because they will, given half a chance.  Or you can stand up. 

In the words of Huey Long, "Always take the offensive. The defensive ain't worth a damn."

Signed,

The Rest of Us

PS--For the love of God, if you really want to win in 2008, please do not run Hillary.

Nov 29, 2005

Newspeak

Although I am way too busy at work to be doing this, a quick deconstruction of a Yahoo/USA Today article.

1. Note how the headline doesn't quite give the gist of the article. There is more than a bit of difference between "defends thwarting attacks" and "defends indefinite detention."

2. Rice was able to deliver these statements with a straight face. She really is a marvel.

Rice defends thwarting major terror attacks

By Barbara Slavin, USA TODAY Tue Nov 29, 6:53 AM ET

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on Monday defended the indefinite detention of terrorist suspects as part of an unprecedented war to prevent massive attacks on civilians.

In an interview with USA TODAY, Rice neither confirmed nor disavowed the existence of secret prisons abroad that The Washington Post reported this month. She said the Bush administration's policy of making arrests before crimes are committed benefits other nations as well as the United States.

"We have never fought a war like this before where ... you can't allow somebody to commit the crime before you detain them," she said. "Because if they commit the crime, thousands of innocent people die."

And if they've committed no crime, that would make them...what's the phrase? Oh yeah. Innocent.

Oct 28, 2005

Hold the Champagne II

Somewhere, George Bush is smiling. Seriously, he probably is. This day could have gone so much worse for him. Instead, he's counting his blessings.

--The indictments came out on a Friday. The White House loves Friday news stories. It's their preferred day for releasing bad news, as most people don't pay attention to the news during the weekend. Think about it: When was the last time you sat down the watch the Saturday evening news?

--Only one guy indicted. Karl Rove is safe for now.

--As far as most of the country is concerned, Scooter Libby is just some guy who works in the White House. For all they know, he could be in charge of changing Cheney's coffee filters. He's an unknown. Plus, because he really has no public persona, the White House has a chance to spin one for him.

--Libby already resigned, saving Bush the embarassment of living up to his promise to fire anyone connected with the Plame case. Plus, one bad apple quickly removed from the White House gives the impression of punishment already being meted out. Harder to make the image of "guilt by association" stick when the association part has been (seemingly) removed..

--Harriet who? Exactly.

Note: If you came here because of a link on a conservative blog, you should know that I am very much a liberal.  I think George Bush is disconnected, incompetent, and far far in over his head.  We would have been a lot better off had he stayed in Texas.  The day he leaves office will be a time for champagne in my house.  Just so we're clear.

Oct 27, 2005

Antidote

In all the fuss about Miers and indictments and whatnot this week, there was a private political meeting that didn't get much news play. Important, though, because it was all about high-powered Democrats trying to decide how they're going to play it next year. Naturally, they skipped items like, "Paul Hackett Showing in Ohio Proves We Could Actually Win Stuff, If We Tried." But at least they took the time to unveil next year's rock-em sock-em party slogan.

Are you ready for it? It's sure a doozy. Maybe you should sit down. Ready? OK!!!

"America Can Do Better"

TA-DA!

Hey? Where are you going?

Continue reading "Antidote" »

Oct 24, 2005

What the...?

Geez--maybe George IS hitting the hooch again.  From today's comments on Harriet Miers:

"People can learn about Harriet Miers through hearings, but we are not going to destroy this business about people being able to walk into the Oval Office and say, Mr. President, here’s my advice to you. Here’s what I think is important."

Leader of the free world, folks. 

Oct 20, 2005

I was hoping for one of those number slates, at least

Tom DeLay's mug shot.  Now appearing on every blog, everywhere, and soon to be available in every form on Cafepress.

Oct 17, 2005

Hold the Champagne

If you read certain blogs and Websites, you will have noticed increasing anticipation about indictments, prosecutions, etc.  They're all a-flutter with the rumors:  "The indictments are coming!  Wednesday!  Thursday!  Soon! Someday!"  But at the risk of losing my "good liberal" tag, I am hardly getting excited over the idea of a Karl Rove post-indictment frogmarch. Mainly because, well...I don't really know that there will be one.

I've seen a lot of anxious spluttering on the Web about how "this leads straight to the top," "they're all going down," "he's toast," and so on. But I'm just not really buying it. I'm not saying I think the White House, Libby, Rove, et al, were aboveboard and forthright in everything they did. Very much the opposite. I absolutely believe there was a conspiracy to defame Wilson, and that hurting his wife was just part of pulling out all the stops. It's not like the Bush Administration hasn't played dirty before (see John McCain, South Carolina primary, 2000).

Sure, there will probably be some indictments. The prosecutor, Patrick Fitzgerald, has more than proved himself in my own town. BUT...anything alleged will be hard to prove, and quite possibly not super-duper criminal.  Meaning: If there were a conspiracy, it was only geared around one or two people (Joe Wilson and his wife)--not exactly wide-ranging--and ultimately, nothing really happened to her. As far as we have been told, the only real upshot was that she had to change jobs. Yes, she could have been hurt--but she wasn't. It does make a difference. And if even if someone wants to argue criminal negligence, indictments for that are damned unlikely. Indirectly putting someone at risk is not going to get Dick Cheney into an orange jumpsuit--no matter how much some people might want to believe that. In addition, after reading about Judith Miller's testimony and the fact that Karl Rove apparently looked awfully damn chipper leaving his meeting on Friday, my hopes are not high. There's no telling what the other witnesses might have said, but by herself Miller sounds like she was a pretty good witness for the defense, and not so hot for the prosecution.

It does not bode well.

Like I said, there could be indictments, but even a conviction doesn't guarantee a jail term. People skate all the time. Bargains are made.  Cheney/Libbey/Bush perp walk?  Karl Rove going to jail?  Charges that bring down the administration?  I just wouldn't bet on it.