Sigh.
I should have known. I should have remembered her defense of OJ, and our arguments over the Elian Gonzales case. I should have assumed that my mother would take a view absolutely opposite mine. Still, I was caught off-guard yesterday when I discovered she believes Michael Jackson is being framed. It's hard enough to watch his apologists on TV, but to have one in your own family... Maddening, because her logic rests on three shaky pillars: "He hasn't hurt anyone; they should just leave him alone," "Someone's just looking for a payday," and, "That DA is just out to get him." Gah.
My personal view: I think he did it, but I don't think this case will go the way everyone expects. I'm not even certain he'll be found guilty. I don't think the DA will go for a plea bargain this time. But, if the accuser is really Gavin Arvizo (as the U.S. press has been hinting and as the foreign press has stated outright), I think he'll be a terrible prosecution witness. Even I've seen the footage of him and his mother talking about how wonderfully innocent the sleepovers were. In addition, his parents are currently in an acrimonious divorce/custody battle, which may have been a factor in bringing the case. Thus, the defense could have a field day. I think the DA is going to have to rely heavily on other evidence--the rumored "love letters" (ick ick ICKY), videotape, etc. I hope it's enough.
I'm really not looking forward to watching the defense team make mincemeat out of a 13-year-old witness. On the other hand, some analysts have been suggesting that we could see a "cleaned-up" Michael at the time of trial--i.e., no makeup, no faux military insignia, etc. That, I want to see.